Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Glorious Jordy's avatar

Just a few banger Darlializa Avila Chevalier quotes:

"Yes, it means ending policing full stop. Period. No more police at all ever."

"Yes, literally, abolish the border."

“A world without borders—just like a world without prisons or police—is possible, necessary, and the only moral way forward."

Lefties can deploy the word salad about how "defund the police" and "abolish prisons" AKSHUALLY means increasing funding to those institutions, but no one is forgetting the fever dream that created by an army neurotic women and far-left lunatics, including AOC. It's never too late to admit you were wrong.

Chris Chandler's avatar

I'm a supporter of neither policing nor corrections as we (in Canada and the US) conceive of and practice them, but I also think your piece demonstrates quite clearly why the "defund" tag was mostly a waste of energy and wilfully misdirected, even at working class racialized communities. For the moment here, I'm not concerned with your take on AOC. But the fact that you need to translate and reframe the best demands and intentions of "defund" kind of says it all. The branding, the hashtag, carried its own, undeniable connotations and rhetorical position. Advocacy for prison and policing reform (that is, the demand for more community based and non-violent law enforcement, and for legitimately humane and rehabilitative prisons) is quite old, and the "defund" movement can be reasonably seen, I think, as both an extension of that history of advocacy, but also as a scuttling of it. AOC could have done a better job of responding to be sure, but saying so submits her to the same kind of analysis (which you engage in, I think) that would argue that "defund" should have picked a better hashtag, and maybe even lost an opportunity.

47 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?